Article Peer-Reviewed
Assessing the Value of Information Technology for the Decarbonization of Freight Transport
1
TREDIT SA and Hellenic Institute of Transport, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15773 Athens, Greece
*
For correspondence.
Received: 18 September 2023 Accepted: 28 December 2023 Published: 5 January 2024
This article is part of the Special Issue Green Economic Growth and Energy Consumption.
Abstract
In its first part, the paper gives a summary of the levels of emissions resulting from each mode of transport by use of statistics at the European and global levels. It also summarizes the main measures and policies that have been put forward for the reduction of freight transport greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To facilitate the subsequent analyses, these measures and policies are classified into four categories, i.e., affecting the “demand” for freight transport services, shifting freight to less or no carbon-intensive modes, improving the energy efficiency of existing freight vehicles, and transitioning to “clean” fuels including electricity and hydrogen. For each of these categories, their current or potential use of information technology (IT) applications is presented, and key examples of such applications are mentioned. In the final part, a multicriteria analysis is performed with the help of two expert panels which are asked to assess, on a 5-level Likert-type scale, the extent of IT use in each of the four categories. The results show an important or very important contribution of IT in all categories except “improving the energy efficiency of current vehicles”. The highest contribution (with scores higher than 4) appears to be in the category “shifting freight to less carbon-intensive modes”.
Figure in this Article
Keywords
transport decarbonization; freight transport; information technologies; climate change; green transport; electrification; freight decarbonization; multicriteria analysis
Copyright © 2024
Giannopoulos and Moschovou. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use and distribution provided that the original work is properly cited.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Cite this Article
Giannopoulos, A. G., & Moschovou, T. P. (2024). Assessing the Value of Information Technology for the Decarbonization of Freight Transport. Highlights of Sustainability, 3(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.54175/hsustain3010002
References
1.
European Parliament. (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’).
2.
European Environment Agency (EEA). (2023). Transport and Mobility. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/transport-and-mobility (accessed 6 September 2023).
3.
IEA. (2023). Transport: Improving the sustainability of passenger and freight transport. https://www.iea.org/topics/transport (accessed 6 September 2023).
4.
McKinnon, A. (9 March 2018). Decarbonization Targets and Measures to Achieve Them Current State of Knowledge. ALICE. (2018). Towards 2050 Zero Emissions Logistics Workshops: Logistics Emissions Reduction Paths Towards Zero Emissions Logistics, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium.
5.
European Commission (EC). (2016). EU reference Scenario 2016: Energy, transport and GHG emissions trends to 2050.
6.
European Parliament. (2023). CO2 emissions from cars: facts and figures (infographics). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20190313STO31218/co2-emissions-from-cars-facts-and-figures-infographics (accessed 4 December 2023).
7.
EUROCONTROL. (2022). EUROCONTRO Forecast Update 2022-2024: Recovery from COVID-19 and Russian invasion of Ukraine. https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/eurocontrol-forecast-update-2022-2024 (accessed 6 September 2023).
8.
Eurostat Statistics Explained. (2023). Freight transport statistics - modal split. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Freight_transport_statistics_-_modal_split (accessed 6 September 2023).
9.
European Commission (EC). (2011). White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system.
10.
European Council. (2018). Renewable energy: Council confirms deal reached with the European Parliament. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/06/27/renewable-energy-council-confirms-deal-reached-with-the-european-parliament (accessed 6 September 2023).
11.
EASAC. (2019). Decarbonization of transport: options and challenges. https://easac.eu/projects/details/decarbonisation-of-transport (accessed 6 September 2023).
12.
European Environment Agency (EEA). (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions from Transport in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport (accessed 5 September 2023).
13.
McKinnon, A. (2018). Decarbonizing logistics: Distributing Goods in a Low Carbon World. Kogan Page.
14.
Min, R. (2023). Sweden is building the world’s first permanent electrified road for EVs to charge while driving. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/05/09/sweden-is-building-the-worlds-first-permanent-electrified-road-for-evs-to-charge-while-dri (accessed 6 September 2023).
15.
Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., & Le Pira, M. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook on city logistics and urban freight. Edward Elgar.
16.
Eurostat Statistics Explained. (2018). Renewable energy statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics#7.25_of_renewable_energy_used_in_transport_activities_in_2016 (accessed 5 September 2023).
17.
European Investment Bank (EIB). (2023). EIB investment report 2022/2023: Resilience and Renewal in Europe. https://www.eib.org/en/publications/20220211-investment-report-2022.htm (accessed 6 September 2023).
18.
Raubal, M., Jonietz, D., Ciari, F., Boulouchos, K., Küng, L., Georges, G., et al. (2017). Towards an Energy Efficient and Climate Compatible Future Swiss Transportation System (Working Paper). Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research—SCEER.
19.
Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., & Maltese, I. (2023). Policy Acceptability and Implementation in Urban Logistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Urban Logistics (1st ed., pp. 267–281). Routledge.
20.
Le Quéré, C., Jackson, R. B., Jones, M. W., Smith, A., Abernethy, S., Andrew, R. M., et al. (2020). Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nature Climate Change, 10, 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x
21.
Jonkeren, O., Francke, J., & Visser, J. (2019). A shift-share based tool for assessing the contribution of a modal shift to the decarbonisation of inland freight transport. European Transport Research Review, 11, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0344-x
22.
Zhang, J., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Bao, S., Yang, D., Xu, H., et al. (2021). Air quality improvement via modal shift: Assessment of rail-water-port integrated system planning in Shenzhen, China. Science of the Total Environment, 791, 148158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148158
23.
de Mello Bandeira, R. A., Goes, G. V., Gonçalves, D. N. S., Márcio de Almeida, D. A., & de Oliveira, C. M. (2019). Electric vehicles in the last mile of urban freight transportation: A sustainability assessment of postal deliveries in Rio de Janeiro-Brazil. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.017
24.
Bosona, T. (2020). Urban freight last mile logistics—Challenges and opportunities to improve sustainability: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(21), 8769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218769
25.
Zhang, R., & Hanaoka, T. (2021). Deployment of electric vehicles in China to meet the carbon neutral target by 2060: Provincial disparities in energy systems, CO2 emissions, and cost effectiveness. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105622
26.
Carlan, V., Sys, C., & Vanelslander, T. (2019). Innovation in Road Freight Transport: Quantifying the Environmental Performance of Operational Cost-Reducing Practices. Sustainability, 11, 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082212
27.
Gialos, A., Zeimpekis, V., Madas, M., & Papageorgiou, K. (2022). Calculation and Assessment of CO2 Emissions in Road Freight Transportation: A Greek Case Study. Sustainability, 14, 10724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710724
28.
Ghisolfi, V., Tavasszy, L. A., Correia, G. H. d. A., Chaves, G. d. L. D., & Ribeiro, G. M. (2022). Freight Transport Decarbonization: A Systematic Literature Review of System Dynamics Models. Sustainability, 14, 3625. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063625
29.
Kechagias, E. P., Gayialis, S. P., Konstantakopoulos, G. D., & Papadopoulos, G. A. (2020). An application of an urban freight transportation system for reduced environmental emissions. Systems, 8(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8040049
30.
Li, Y., Lim, M. K., Tan, Y., Lee, Y., & Tseng, M. L. (2020). Sharing economy to improve routing for urban logistics distribution using electric vehicles. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104585
31.
Dündar, H., Ömürgönülşen, M., & Soysal, M. (2021). A review on sustainable urban vehicle routing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125444
32.
Jazairy, A., Pohjosenperä, T., Sassali, J., Juga, J., & von Haartman, R. (2023). Driving the talk: examining professional truck drivers’ motivations to engage in eco-driving. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(11), 98–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2022-0236
33.
Fafoutellis, P., Mantouka, E. G., & Vlahogianni, E. I. (2020). Eco-driving and its impacts on fuel efficiency: An overview of technologies and data-driven methods. Sustainability, 13(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010226
34.
Ng, E. C., Huang, Y., Hong, G., Zhou, J. L., & Surawski, N. C. (2021). Reducing vehicle fuel consumption and exhaust emissions from the application of a green-safety device under real driving. Science of the Total Environment, 793, 148602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148602
35.
Bibeka, A., Songchitruksa, P., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Assessing environmental impacts of ad-hoc truck platooning on multilane freeways. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2019.1608441
36.
Validi, A., & Olaverri-Monreal, C. (2021). Simulation-based impact of connected vehicles in platooning mode on travel time, emissions and fuel consumption. In 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 1150–1155). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV48863.2021.9575899
37.
Paddeu, D., & Denby, J. (2022). Decarbonizing Road freight: Is truck automation and platooning an opportunity? Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24, 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-02020-9
38.
Yowtak, K., Imiola, J., Andrews, M., Cardillo, K., & Skerlos, S. (2020). Comparative life cycle assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles, internal combustion engine vehicles and battery electric vehicles for grocery delivery. Procedia CIRP, 90, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.003
39.
Massar, M., Reza, I., Rahman, S. M., Abdullah, S. M. H., Jamal, A., & Al-Ismail, F. S. (2021). Impacts of autonomous vehicles on greenhouse gas emissions—positive or negative? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115567
40.
Ercan, T., Onat, N. C., Keya, N., Tatari, O., Eluru, N., & Kucukvar, M. (2022). Autonomous electric vehicles can reduce carbon emissions and air pollution in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103472
41.
De Oliveira Leite Nascimento, C., Gatta, V., & Marcucci, E. (2023). Green Crowdshipping: Critical factors from a business perspective. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 51, 101062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101062
42.
Rail Freight Forward. (2020). White Paper: 30 by 2030 Rail Freight strategy to boost modal shift. https://www.railfreightforward.eu/sites/default/files/usercontent/white_paper-30by2030-150dpi6.pdf (accessed 5 September 2023).
43.
Feldmann, J., Byrum, Z., & Cyrs, T. (2023). Clean hydrogen: Outlook for freight transport in the United States (Working Paper). World Resources Institute. https://doi.org/10.46830/wriwp.21.00155
44.
Giannopoulos, A. G., & Moschovou, T. P. (2023). Estimating the Value of Information Technology in the Productivity of the Transport Sector. Future Transportation, 3(2), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp3020035
45.
Macharis, C., de Witte, A., & Ampe, J. (2009). The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 43(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670430206
46.
L’Hostis, A., Muller, B., Meyer, G., Bruckner, A., Foldesi, E., Dablanc, L., et al. (2016). MOBILITY4EU - D2.1 - Societal needs and requirements for future transportation and mobility as well as opportunities and challenges of current solutions. Mobility4EU. https://hal.science/hal-01486783v2 (accessed 6 September 2023).
47.
Gagatsi, E., Giannopoulos, G. A., Aifantopoulou, G. A., & Charalampous, G. (2017). Stakeholders-based multi-criteria policy analysis in maritime transport: from theory to practice. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.062
48.
Wong, J. K. W., & Li, H. (2008). Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment, 43(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019
49.
Cohon, L. J., & Morgan, M. G. (2017). Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and Multi-Criteria Decision Making. In Theory and Practice in Policy Analysis (pp. 155–184). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882665.007
50.
Belton, V. (1999). Multi-Criteria Problem Structuring and Analysis in a Value Theory Framework. In T. Gal, T. J. Stewart, & T. Hanne (Eds.), Multicriteria Decision Making. Springer International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (pp. 335–366). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5025-9_12
51.
Shakirov, V. (2019). Decision-Making Based on Multi-Attribute Value Theory Under Preference Uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 7th Scientific Conference on Information Technologies for Intelligent Decision-Making Support (ITIDS 2019) (pp. 177–183). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/itids-19.2019.32
52.
Goswami, S. S. (2020). Outranking Methods: Promethee I and Promethee II. Foundations of Management, 12(1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2020-0008
53.
Madanchian, Μ., & Taherdoost, H. (2023). A Comprehensive Overview of the ELECTRE Method in Multi Criteria Decision-Making. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 6(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v6i2.5637
54.
Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12, 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90
55.
Ulschak, F. L. (1983). Human Resource Development: The Theory and Practice of Need Assessment. Prentice Hall.
Metrics
Loading...
Journal Menu
Journal Contact
Highlights of Sustainability
Editorial Office
Highlights of Science
Avenida Madrid, 189-195, 3-3
08014 Barcelona, Spain
08014 Barcelona, Spain
Cathy Wang
Managing Editor
